Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455687›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Consumer acceptance of bacteriophage technology for microbial control.

Taylor Thompson, Valerie Kilders, Nicole Widmar, Paul Ebner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taylor ThompsonDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
Valerie KildersDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA. vkilders@purdue.edu.
Nicole WidmarDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
Paul EbnerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As global concerns and awareness of the threat posed by antimicrobial resistance (AMR) grow, the One Health initiative provides a framework to advance public understanding of and willingness to address AMR. The use of bacteriophages as a non-antibiotic means to control bacterial infections aligns with this framework, but it is unknown whether the use of new antibiotic alternatives, and bacteriophages in particular, will find acceptance among consumers. Within the context of poultry production and consumption, we sampled 1497 Pakistani consumers studying their knowledge of and familiarity with antibiotics, bacteriophages and AMR, whether they perceived AMR as a threat, and their willingness to accept alternative microbial control technologies. Additionally, we tested the impact information about bacteriophages had on the different concepts as well as respondents' perception of different chicken quality attributes. Using both Probit and Multivariate Probit models we found that familiarity with antibiotics and bacteriophages is significantly associated with the acceptance of alternative microbial control technologies and perceptions of resulting products. Moreover, we find that providing information about the technology does not significantly alter respondent's perception of most quality attributes.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesAdultAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChickensConsumer BehaviorFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPakistanAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID39455687
PMCPMC11512061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.