Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455646›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Response tests on the effects of particle size of waste glass sand and glass powder on the mechanical and durability performance of concrete.

Gejun Tong, Jianyong Pang, Jingzhao Shen, Bin Tang, Ziliang Jiang, Bing Li, Jinkun Huang, Jiuqun Zou, Heng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gejun TongSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui, 232001, China. aust_tonggejun@163.com.
Jianyong PangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui, 232001, China.
Jingzhao ShenNational Institute of Coal Mining Engineering Technology Ping 'an Coal Mining Engineering Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd, Huainan, Anhui, 232001, China.
Bin TangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui, 232001, China.
Ziliang JiangNational Institute of Coal Mining Engineering Technology Ping 'an Coal Mining Engineering Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd, Huainan, Anhui, 232001, China.
Bing LiSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui, 232001, China.
Jinkun HuangChina MCC17 Group Co., Ltd., Maanshan, Anhui, 243000, China.
Jiuqun ZouSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui, 232001, China.
Heng WangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui, 232001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the effect of waste glass material particle sizes on the mechanical and durability properties of concrete, a two-phase experimental approach was conducted. First, comprehensive tests were performed to examine the effects of glass sand and glass powder of different particle sizes on concrete performance. Subsequently, based on the experimental results, an orthogonal test was designed to optimize the replacement amounts of composite particle sizes. The results indicated that an appropriate amount of glass sand can enhance the mechanical properties and durability of concrete, while excessive amounts or larger particle sizes may have adverse effects. The pozzolanic effect of glass powder also contributes to performance improvement, but the replacement rate should be limited to 20%. Under composite particle size conditions, the compressive, tensile, and shear strengths of concrete increased by 35.56%, 21.74%, and 13.79%, respectively, while durability significantly improved, with water absorption reduced by 20.73% and chloride ion permeability decreased by 63.10%. At a total replacement rate of 20%, the optimal proportions were determined to be 2.86% for 0.6 mm glass sand, 1.43% for 1.18 mm glass sand, 8.57% for 50-60 μm glass powder, and 7.14% for 60-70 μm glass powder. The incorporation of composite particle sizes improved the microstructure of concrete, thereby enhancing its mechanical and durability properties.

Indexed as

Combined blendingDurabilityGlass powderGlass sandMechanical property

Identifiers

PMID39455646
PMCPMC11512063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.