ArticleScientific reports2024
Deep transfer learning with improved crayfish optimization algorithm for oral squamous cell carcinoma cancer recognition using histopathological images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Models for Detecting Odontogenic Keratocytes on CBCT Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Review
- A weakly supervised deep learning model for OSCC diagnosis and lesion highlighting in histopathology images.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- SSDA_AOA: Stacked Sparse Denoising Autoencoder With Archimedes Optimization Algorithm Based Oral Cancer Detection on Histopathological Images.Oral diseases · 2026Article
- Updates, Applications and Future Directions of Deep Learning for the Images Processing in the Field of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Current AI Applications and Challenges in Oral Pathology.Oral (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) causes a severe challenge in oncology due to the lack of diagnostic devices, leading to delays in detecting the disorder. The OSCC diagnosis through histopathology demands a pathologist expert because the cellular presentation is variable and highly complex. Existing diagnostic approaches for OSCC have specific efficiency and accuracy restrictions, highlighting the necessity for more reliable techniques. The increase of deep neural networks (DNN) model and their applications in medical imaging have been instrumental in disease diagnosis and detection. Automatic detection systems using deep learning (DL) approaches show tremendous promise in investigating medical imagery with speed, efficiency, and accuracy. In terms of OSCC, this system allows the diagnostic method to be streamlined, facilitating earlier diagnosis and enhancing survival rates. Automatic analysis of histopathological image (HI) can assist in accurately detecting and identifying tumorous tissue, reducing diagnostic turnaround times and increasing the efficacy of pathologists. This study presents a Squeeze-Excitation with Hybrid Deep Learning for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Recognition (SEHDL-OSCCR) on HIs. The presented SEHDL-OSCCR technique mainly focuses on detecting oral cancer (OC) using hybrid DL models. The bilateral filtering (BF) technique is initially used to remove the noise. Next, the SEHDL-OSCCR technique employs the SE-CapsNet model to recognize the feature extractors. An improved crayfish optimization algorithm (ICOA) technique is utilized to improve the performance of the SE-CapsNet model. At last, the classification of the OSCC technique is performed by employing a convolutional neural network with a bidirectional long short-term memory (CNN-BiLSTM) model. The simulation results obtained using the SEHDL-OSCCR technique are investigated using a benchmark medical image dataset. The experimental validation of the SEHDL-OSCCR technique illustrated a greater accuracy outcome of 98.75% compared to recent approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.