ArticleScientific reports2024
Design & development of adulteration detection system by fumigation method & machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- HS-SPME-GC-MS Coupled with Chemometrics for Detecting HFCS and Invert Sugar Adulteration in Coriander Honey.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Honey Botanical Origin Authentication Using HS-SPME-GC-MS Volatile Profiling and Advanced Machine Learning Models (Random Forest, XGBoost, and Neural Network).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of molecular and chromatographic methods for detecting palm oil adulteration in yogurt.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel method for discovery of adulteration in edible oil is proposed based on concept of refractive index and electronic sensors. The research work focusses on two distinct methodologies like employing datasets and implementing a fumigation technique that integrates real-time hardware for testing Edible oil Impurities. In the first method, the dataset taken into consideration contains spectral data collected using Advanced ATR-MIR Spectroscopy for pure oil and various levels of adulteration with Vegetable oil. Each and every edible oil has a certain value of refractive index. When such oils are contemned in a change adding adulterants, the value of its refractive indices also changes. This value of refractive index serves as a feature for testing the oil and helps us in detecting the adulteration. If Oil is adulterated with vegetable oils, the refractive index will be lower and with animal fats, the refractive index will be higher than that of pure Oil. While in Fumigation Method a hardware module is develop in which adulterated & pure oil samples are heated at 40-50 °C for 4.66 min and the volatiles that are generated by varying gas concentrations are forcefully passed through to the MEMS Gas Sensor-MISC-2714 and Multichannel Gas sensor. The conductance of the sensors changes according to the gases sensed by the sensors contributes to features extraction. The conductance value serves as a feature for the classifier to determine whether the sample is highly, moderately, or lowly contaminated. Thus, in proposed methods we use different algorithms based on machine learning like KNN, Random Forest, CATBOOST and XGBOOST to accurately reveal the adulteration. Amongst all the applied algorithm Random Forest (RF) Classifier & XGBOOST algorithm outperform well and gives 100% accuracy. The proposed work is used for identifying food adulteration in edible food products which helps us to feed Society with high-quality food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.