Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455543›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Comparative Bladder Cancer Tissues Prediction Using Vision Transformer.

Kubilay Muhammed Sunnetci, Faruk Enes Oguz, Mahmut Nedim Ekersular, Nadide Gulsah Gulenc, Mahmut Ozturk, Ahmet Alkan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kubilay Muhammed SunnetciDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey.
Faruk Enes OguzHatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hassa Vocational School, Hatay, Turkey.
Mahmut Nedim EkersularDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.
Nadide Gulsah GulencDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey.
Mahmut OzturkDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet AlkanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. aalkan@ksu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-0764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer, often asymptomatic in the early stages, is a type of cancer where early detection is crucial. Herein, endoscopic images are meticulously evaluated by experts, and sometimes even by different disciplines, to identify tissue types. It is believed that the time spent by experts can be utilized for patient treatment with the creation of a computer-aided decision support system. For this purpose, in this study, it is evaluated that the performances of three models proposed using the bladder tissue dataset. The first model is a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning (DL) network, and the second is a model named hybrid cnn-machine learning (ML) or DL + ML, which involves classifying deep features obtained from a CNN-based network with ML. The last one, and the one that achieved the best performance metrics, is a vision transformer (ViT) architecture. Furthermore, a graphical user interface (GUI) is provided for an accessible decision support system. As a result, accuracy and F1 score values for DL, DL + ML, and ViT models are 0.9086-0.8971-0.9257 and 0.8884-0.8496-0.8931, respectively.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansBladder cancerClassificationDeep learningMachine learningVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID39455543
PMCPMC12092318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.