SynthesisReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024
The Annual Economic Burden of Uterine Fibroids in the United States (2010 Versus 2022): A Comparative Cost-Analysis.
Synthesis in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of the Role of Senescent Cells in Uterine Leiomyomas: Deciphering Molecular Pathways and Exploring Therapeutic Prospects.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Pooled it
- Gut Dysbiosis in Selected Gynecological Diseases Associated with Female Infertility: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Pharmacological treatment for uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Burden of anemia in women with uterine fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Vitamin D3 ameliorates R-loop-induced replication stress and chromosomal instability in MED12-mutant uterine fibroids.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Elevated Body Mass Index Associated With Uterine Fibroids: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Bioinformatic Validation.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Regulation of Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors: Histone Modifications in Uterine Fibroids and Leiomyosarcoma.Biology · 2026Review
- Insights on Medical Therapy for Uterine Fibroids: A Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Phenome-wide association study of uterine fibroid subtypes reveals symptoms of fibroid severity and subtype-specific comorbidities.Research square · 2026Article
- Endometrial Dysfunction in Women with Ovarian and Uterine Tumors: What Is Known and What Should Be Learned?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Vitamin D3 ameliorates R-loop-induced replication stress and chromosomal instability in MED12-mutant uterine fibroids.Research square · 2026Article
- Global Trends and Burden of Non-Neoplastic Gynecologic Diseases Among Women of Childbearing Age, 1990-2021: a GBD 2021 Analysis.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Overcoming Mechanical Blindness: Adaptive Surgical Instrument Design for the Heterogeneous Landscape of Uterine Fibroids.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Cost analysis of hospital-based symptomatic uterine fibroids in the kingdom of Eswatini: A prevalence-based cost-of-illness study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Decoding Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Domain Protein-Mediated Epigenetic Mechanisms in Human Uterine Fibroids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Glycolytic Reprogramming in Uterine Fibroids: Genetic, Transcriptomic, Proteomic, and Metabolomic Insights.Genes · 2025Review
- Article
- The epidemiology of uterine fibroids: global disease burden from 1990 to 2021 and future trend predictions.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2010, the estimated annual cost of uterine fibroids in the United States ranged from 5.9 to 34.4 billion USD. In the past decade, more uterine-sparing and fertility preserving interventions have become available to treat symptomatic fibroids. This comparative cost-analysis aims to evaluate change in societal costs of uterine fibroids in the US between 2010 and 2022 given changing fibroid and obstetric management, population growth, and inflation. A systematic review was conducted to update uterine fibroid, treatment, and obstetric complication prevalence, direct costs of medical and surgical interventions, indirect productivity costs, and obstetric costs attributable to fibroids in 2022. A comparative cost-analysis with paired t-tests was performed using baseline data published in 2010. Percent (%) changes between 2010 and 2022 were reported. NIH research funding for fibroids and other common diseases was compared. All costs were converted to 2023 USD. The number of US women with uterine fibroids increased by 10.6% from 2010 to 2022. Over this period, the economic burden of uterine fibroids increased up to 41.4 billion USD compared to 34.4 billion USD in 2010. Overall costs increased to 42.2 billion USD after incorporating new costs associated with MRgFUS and infertility. Direct costs of medical management decreased while costs of surgical interventions increased as a result of evolving treatment-seeking behavior. Lost work costs continue to account for the largest proportion of the economic burden for fibroids. Cesarean section delivery remains the largest contributor (average 80.0%) to indirect obstetrical costs. Despite the rise in the number of individuals affected by uterine fibroids and its sizable annual cost to society, uterine fibroids research continues to be underfunded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.