Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455488›Full record

SynthesisReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024

The Annual Economic Burden of Uterine Fibroids in the United States (2010 Versus 2022): A Comparative Cost-Analysis.

Dana Hazimeh, Abigail Coco, Imaima Casubhoy, James Segars, Bhuchitra Singh

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Pharmacological treatment for uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dana Hazimeh *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Abigail Coco *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Imaima CasubhoyDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
James SegarsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Bhuchitra SinghDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Sciences & Women's Health Research, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. bsingh10@jhmi.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2113-4345

Funding

1/4 Reproductive Medicine Collaborative Consortium: a randomized placebo-controlled trial of EGCG to improve fertility in women with uterine fibroidsR01HD100365 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, VALERIE LYNN, SEGARS, JAMES H. · 2019 to 2023
$988k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2010, the estimated annual cost of uterine fibroids in the United States ranged from 5.9 to 34.4 billion USD. In the past decade, more uterine-sparing and fertility preserving interventions have become available to treat symptomatic fibroids. This comparative cost-analysis aims to evaluate change in societal costs of uterine fibroids in the US between 2010 and 2022 given changing fibroid and obstetric management, population growth, and inflation. A systematic review was conducted to update uterine fibroid, treatment, and obstetric complication prevalence, direct costs of medical and surgical interventions, indirect productivity costs, and obstetric costs attributable to fibroids in 2022. A comparative cost-analysis with paired t-tests was performed using baseline data published in 2010. Percent (%) changes between 2010 and 2022 were reported. NIH research funding for fibroids and other common diseases was compared. All costs were converted to 2023 USD. The number of US women with uterine fibroids increased by 10.6% from 2010 to 2022. Over this period, the economic burden of uterine fibroids increased up to 41.4 billion USD compared to 34.4 billion USD in 2010. Overall costs increased to 42.2 billion USD after incorporating new costs associated with MRgFUS and infertility. Direct costs of medical management decreased while costs of surgical interventions increased as a result of evolving treatment-seeking behavior. Lost work costs continue to account for the largest proportion of the economic burden for fibroids. Cesarean section delivery remains the largest contributor (average 80.0%) to indirect obstetrical costs. Despite the rise in the number of individuals affected by uterine fibroids and its sizable annual cost to society, uterine fibroids research continues to be underfunded.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Care CostsLeiomyomaUterine NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPregnancyUnited StatesCost of fibroidsFibroidsNIH research fundingObstetric costs of fibroidsUterine leiomyomata

Identifiers

PMID39455488
PMCPMC12720250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.