Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455461›Full record

Observational studyJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2025

Stability of unilateral posterior crossbite treatment with the Function Generating Bite appliance : Association with reduction of mandibular clockwise rotation and increased maxillary transversal width measurements.

Maria Grazia Piancino, Alessandro Tortarolo, Laura Di Benedetto, Luigi Moscufo, Ludovica Nucci, Michela Bersia

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Grazia PiancinoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Dental School, University of Turin, via Nizza 230, CAP 10126, Turin, Italy. mariagrazia.piancino@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0220-5283
Alessandro TortaroloDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Dental School, University of Turin, via Nizza 230, CAP 10126, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4700-1732
Laura Di BenedettoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Dental School, University of Turin, via Nizza 230, CAP 10126, Turin, Italy.
Luigi MoscufoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Dental School, University of Turin, via Nizza 230, CAP 10126, Turin, Italy.
Ludovica NucciMultidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialties, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Michela BersiaDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis observational study aimed to evaluate the stability of unilateral posterior crossbite (UPXB) correction with the functional appliance function generating bite (FGB appliance) during follow-up and its effects on craniofacial growth. MATERIALS AND

methodA total of 102 age- and gender-matched patients were included: 51 with UPXB (male [M] = 19; female [F] = 32; mean age ± standard deviation [SD] = 7.6 ± 1.4 [years.months]) and 51 controls (C; M = 19; F = 32; mean age ± SD = 7.9 ± 1.3). UPXB was corrected with the FGB appliance. Study casts were collected before treatment (T0), after correction (T1), after a follow-up of 3.7 ± 1.6 [years.months] (T2) and different transversal measurements were performed with calipers: intermolar (IMD), intermolar gingival (IMGD), intercanine (ICD), and intercanine gingival distances (ICGD). In treated patients, in addition, lateral cephalometric tracings were analyzed at T0 and T2.

resultsAt T0, all maxillary measurements were significantly smaller in the UPXB group compared to the controls (p < 0.001). Between T0 and T1, all maxillary variables increased significantly in the UPXB group (p < 0.001; IMD +4.3 ± 2.1 mm; ICD +3.1 ± 2 mm). Between T1 and T2, maxillary IMD increased further (p < 0.05; +2.2 ± 2 mm). The mean T0-T2 increases were 6.6 ± 2.6 mm (IMD) and 4.3 ± 2.6 mm (ICD). At T0, the cephalometric analysis showed significantly stronger mandibular clockwise rotation (p < 0.01) in the UPXB group compared to the control group. Between T0 and T2, the UPXB group showed a significant reduction of mandibular (p < 0.001; SpP-CoOr T0 = -3.47°± 4.38, T2 = -1.14°± 4.01) and occlusal plane (p < 0.01; SpP-Oc T0 = 11.37°± 3.91, T2 = 9.86°± 3.83) clockwise rotation, and of intermaxillary divergence (p < 0.01; SpP-GoGn T0 = 27.8°± 5.39, T2 = 26.65°± 5.49).

conclusionsTreatment of UPXB with the FGB appliance effectively increased maxillary transversal width measurements, especially in the posterior region, even after follow-up, indicating stable results. Concurrently, mandibular clockwise rotation was reduced, indicating control of the vertical dimension.

Indexed as

MalocclusionMandibleMaxillaOrthodontic Appliances, FunctionalCephalometryChildFemaleHumansMaleRotationTreatment OutcomeCephalometryFunctional orthodontic applianceMalocclusionMandibular clockwise rotationMaxillary transversal width measurements

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.