ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Follicular Unit Excision Hair Removal of Unwanted Facial Terminal Hair in Five Facial Areas: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Paramedian Forehead Flap Hair Removal: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Timing, Challenges, and Future Directions.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Review
- Clinical Applications of Punch-Based Techniques in Dermatologic Surgery.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConventional epilation methods commonly encounter challenges in achieving permanent removal of unwanted facial terminal hair (uFTH), particularly when it is interspersed among normal hairs.
objectiveTo assess the safety and effectiveness of follicular unit excision (FUE) for permanent removal of uFTH.
methodsThe retrospective analysis included 231 patients who underwent FUE hair removal at three medical centers. uFTH in five facial areas was excised and assessed for follicular integrity. Surgical details, complications, in situ hair regrowth, and patient satisfaction were recorded and analyzed.
resultsScattered uFTH was excised using a fine punch (inner diameter, 0.6~0.7 mm) at a rate of 18.0~23.6 units per minute in five facial areas. The procedure yielded a low transection rate of only 6.2% (median), minimizing in situ hair regeneration and facilitating the intact harvesting of hair follicles for transplantation. Most sites exhibited optimal wound healing without visible scarring. The overall complication rate is 26.3%, with folliculitis accounting for 3%. Overall satisfaction was significantly high, reaching 96.6%.
conclusionFUE technique is a precise and effective potential approach for uFTH permanent removal in facial areas. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39455457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.