Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455414›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease

Evaluation of preoperative cardiopulmonary reserve and surgical risk of patients undergoing lung cancer resection.

Francesco Petrella, Andrea Cara, Enrico Mario Cassina, Paola Faverio, Giovanni Franco, Lidia Libretti, Emanuele Pirondini, Federico Raveglia, Maria Chiara Sibilia, Antonio Tuoro and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesco PetrellaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, Monza (MB) 20090, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5945-1576
Andrea CaraDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Enrico Mario CassinaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Paola FaverioDivision of Respiratory Disease, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Giovanni FrancoDivision of Respiratory Disease, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Lidia LibrettiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Emanuele PirondiniDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Federico RavegliaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Maria Chiara SibiliaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Antonio TuoroDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Sara VaquerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Fabrizio LuppiDivision of Respiratory Disease, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer represents the second most frequent neoplasm and the leading cause of neoplastic death among both women and men, causing almost 25% of all cancer deaths. Patients undergoing lung resection-both for primary and secondary tumors-require careful preoperative cardiopulmonary functional evaluation to confirm the safety of the planned resection, to assess the maximum tolerable volume of resection or to exclude surgery, thus shifting the therapeutic approach toward less invasive options. Cardiopulmonary reserve, pulmonary lung function and mechanical respiratory function represent the cornerstones of preoperative assessment of patients undergoing major lung resection. Spirometry with carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, split function tests, exercise tests and cardiologic evaluation are the gold standard instruments to safely assess the entire cardiorespiratory function before pulmonary resection. Although pulmonary mechanical and parenchymal function, together with cardiorespiratory compliance represent the mainstay of preoperative evaluation in thoracic surgery, the variables that are responsible for fitness in patients who have undergone lung resection have expanded and are being continually investigated. Nevertheless, because of the shift to older patients who undergo lung resection, a global approach is required, taking into consideration variables like frailty status and likelihood of postoperative functional deterioration. Finally, the decision to go ahead with surgery in fragile patients being consideredfor lung resection should be evaluated in a multispecialty preoperative discussion to provide a personalized risk stratification. The aim of this review is to focus on preoperative evaluation of cardiopulmonary reserve and surgical risk stratification of patients candidate for lung cancer resection. It does so by a literature search of clinical guidelines, expert consensus statements, meta-analyses, clinical recommendations, book chapters and randomized trials (1980-2022).

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyPreoperative CareCardiorespiratory FitnessClinical Decision-MakingHumansLungPatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsRespiratory Function TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment Outcomecardiopulmonary exercise testinglung cancerlung function testslung resection

Identifiers

PMID39455414
PMCPMC11523151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.