ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics2025
Capillary flow velocity-based length identification of PCR and RPA products on paper microfluidic chips.
Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidic and Paper-Based Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Systems for Decentralized Diagnostics and Biosurveillance.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Rapid Detection of Animal-Derived Components in Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Using Recombinase Polymerase Amplification.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Picosecond Laser Etching of Glass Spiral Microfluidic Channel for Microparticles Dispersion and Sorting.Micromachines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work demonstrates a novel, non-fluorescence approach to the length identification of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) products, utilizing capillary flow velocities on paper microfluidic chips. It required only a blank paper chip, aminated microspheres, and a smartphone, with a rapid assay time and under ambient lighting. A smartphone evaluated the initial capillary flow velocities on the paper chips for the PCR and RPA products from various bacterial samples, where the pre-loaded aminated microspheres differentiated their flow velocities. Flow velocities were analyzed at different time frames and compared with the instantaneous flow velocities and interfacial tension (γ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.