Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39455071›Full record

ReviewBMJ military health2025

Importance of strength training for sustaining performance and health in military personnel.

Ritva S Mikkonen, J R Drain, J Vaara, B Nindl, H Kyröläinen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ military health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ritva S MikkonenDepartment of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Jyvaskyla, Finland ritva.s.mikkonen@jyu.fi.
J R DrainDefence Science and Technology Group, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
J VaaraDepartment of Leadership and Military Pedagogy, National Defence University, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2346-4073
B NindlNeuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
H KyröläinenDepartment of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Jyvaskyla, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5668-2202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physical capacity of male and female warfighters is challenged on the modern battlefield by heavy loads and high-intensity work. When designing training programmes for warfighters, approaches for developing strength and power alongside endurance must be considered. Strength training often requires facilities that may not be available during deployments while multiple stressors may impair or decrease overall performance. Understanding the effect of military environments on warfighter performance and acknowledging the variation in demands for individuals during field training and deployments, including possible sex differences, is essential to promote the development of adequate physical reserves (strength, power and endurance), attenuate risk for injury and promote health during and after military careers. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss considerations for programming physical training in a military environment where 'one size does not fit all'. In addition, a brief description of physiological contributions (neural and muscular) to strength development is included.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelResistance TrainingFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthPhysiologyPREVENTIVE MEDICINESPORTS MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID39455071
PMCPMC12505114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.