ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2025
PREDICTING UNPLANNED TRAUMA INTENSIVE CARE UNIT ADMISSIONS FOR INITIAL NONOPERATIVE, NON-ICU PATIENTS.
Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Unplanned Intubations in Rib Fracture Patients: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach.The American surgeon · 2026Article
- Unplanned intensive care unit admissions in trauma patients: A critical appraisal.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Development of a machine learning-derived model to predict unplanned ICU admissions after major non-cardiac surgery.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractIntroduction: Unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study uses interpretable machine learning to predict unplanned ICU admissions for initial nonoperative trauma patients admitted to non-ICU locations. Methods: TQIP (2020-2021) was queried for initial nonoperative adult patients admitted to non-ICU locations. Univariable analysis compared patients who required an unplanned ICU admission to those who did not. Using variables that could be known at hospital admission, gradient boosting machines (CatBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost) were trained on 2021 data and tested on 2020 data. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for interpretation. Results: The cohort had 1,107,822 patients; 1.6% had an unplanned ICU admission. Unplanned ICU admissions were older (71 [58-80] vs. 61 [39-76] years, P < 0.01), had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (9 [8-13] vs. 9 [4-10], P < 0.01), longer length of stay (11 [7-17] vs. 4 [3-6] days, P < 0.01), higher rates of all complications, and most comorbidities and injuries ( P < 0.05). All models had an AUC of 0.78 and an F1 score of 0.12, indicating poor performance in predicting the minority class. Mean absolute SHAP values revealed ISS (0.46), age (0.29), and absence of comorbidities (0.16) as most influential in predictions. Dependency plots showed greater SHAP values for greater ISS, age, and presence of comorbidities. Conclusions: Machine learning may outperform prior attempts at predicting the risk of unplanned ICU admissions in trauma patients while identifying unique predictors. Despite this progress, further research is needed to improve predictive performance by addressing class imbalance limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.