ReviewAdvances in biological regulation2024
Sphingosine phosphate lyase insufficiency syndrome as a primary immunodeficiency state.
Review in Advances in biological regulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sphingosine phosphate lyase insufficiency syndrome (SPLIS) is a genetic disease associated with renal, endocrine, neurological, skin and immune defects. SPLIS is caused by inactivating mutations in SGPL1, which encodes sphingosine phosphate lyase (SPL). SPL catalyzes the irreversible degradation of the bioactive sphingolipid sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a key regulator of lymphocyte egress. The SPL reaction represents the only exit point of sphingolipid metabolism, and SPL insufficiency causes widespread sphingolipid derangements that could additionally contribute to immunodeficiency. Herein, we review SPLIS, the sphingolipid metabolic pathway, and various roles sphingolipids play in immunity. We then explore SPLIS-related immunodeficiency by analyzing data available in the published literature supplemented by medical record reviews in ten SPLIS children. We found 93% of evaluable SPLIS patients had documented evidence of immunodeficiency. Many of the remainder of cases were unevaluable due to lack of available immunological data. Most commonly, SPLIS patients exhibited lymphopenia and T cell-specific lymphopenia, consistent with the established role of the S1P/S1P1/SPL axis in lymphocyte egress. However, low B and NK cell counts, hypogammaglobulinemia, and opportunistic infections with bacterial, viral and fungal pathogens were observed. Diminished responses to childhood vaccinations were less frequently observed. Screening blood tests quantifying recent thymic emigrants identified some lymphopenic SPLIS patients in the newborn period. Lymphopenia has been reported to improve after cofactor supplementation in some SPLIS patients, indicating upregulation of SPL activity. A variety of treatments including immunoglobulin replacement, prophylactic antimicrobials and special preparation of blood products prior to transfusion have been employed in SPLIS. The diverse immune consequences in SPLIS patients suggest that aberrant S1P signaling may not fully explain the extent of immunodeficiency. Further study will be required to fully elucidate the complex mechanisms underlying SPLIS immunodeficiency and determine the most effective prophylaxis against infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.