ArticleBlood advances2025
Long-term real-world evidence of CPX-351 of high-risk patients with AML identified high rate of negative MRD and prolonged OS.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- CPX-351 selectively benefits patients with AML and myelodysplasia-related mutations in the pivotal randomized trial.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Real World Study on the Best CPX-351 Treatment Duration and Timing for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.American journal of hematology · 2025Trial
- Article
- Biomarkers and advances in AML-MRC: from bench to bedside.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Intermediate doses cytarabine after induction with CPX-351 for patients with secondary AML: safety and efficacy.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- CPX-351 and the Frontier of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A Relapsed AML Case Featuring MYC and MECOM Rearrangements.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Real-world experience with first-line CPX-351 treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia - long-term follow-up with focus on younger patients.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractCPX-351 has been approved for patients with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (MRC-AML). No extensive data are available on measurable residual disease (MRD) and long-term clinical outcome using CPX-351 in AML in real life. We retrospectively collected data from 168 patients in 36 centers in France and Italy who had received 1 or 2 cycles of induction with CPX-351. All patients were aged >18 years and had newly diagnosed, untreated t-AML or MRC-AML. With a median follow-up of 3 years, the median overall survival (OS) was 13.3 months. The median OS was 20.4 months vs 12.9 months for patients with MRD below or above 10-3, respectively (P = .006). In a multivariate analysis, only MRD >10-3 was associated with a poorer OS (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.5; P = .013). We also observed a trend toward a better median OS in patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with MRD <10-3 (not reached vs 26.0 months; P = .06). Achievement of MRD negativity contributed to the improvement of OS in the overall population and, maybe, in patients receiving transplant. These data provide the rationale for the 2 ongoing studies evaluating CPX-351 vs 7+3 in non-MRC-AML and non-t-AML using MRD as the primary end point for ALFA-2101 phase 2 clinical trial and event-free survival for AMLSG 30-18 phase 3 clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.