Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39454194›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Examining Quitting Experiences on Quit Vaping Subreddits From 2015 to 2021: Content Analysis.

Elexis Kierstead, Nathan Silver, Michael Amato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Barriers to quittingPreventive medicine reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Methods for Vaping Cessation Among Young Adults in Southern California.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elexis KiersteadTruth Initiative, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8502-0451
Nathan SilverTruth Initiative, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0325-2559
Michael AmatoTruth Initiative, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9769-957X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the prevalence of vaping nicotine, most nicotine cessation research remains focused on smoking cigarettes. However, the lived experience of quitting smoking is different from quitting vaping. As a result, research examining the unique experiences of those quitting vaping can better inform quitting resources and cessation programs specific to e-cigarette use. Examining Reddit forums (ie, subreddits) dedicated to the topics of quitting vaping nicotine can provide insight into the discussion around experiences on quitting vaping. Prior literature examining limited discussions around quitting vaping on Reddit has identified the sharing of barriers and facilitators for quitting, but more research is needed to investigate the content comprehensively across all subreddits.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to examine content across quit vaping subreddits since their inception to better understand quitting vaping within the context of the expanding nicotine market.

methodsAll posts from January 2015 to October 2021 were scraped from all quit vaping subreddits: r/QuittingJuul, r/QuitVaping, r/quit_vaping, and r/stopvaping (N=7110). Rolling weekly average post volume was calculated. A codebook informed by a latent Dirichlet allocation topic model was developed to characterize themes in a subsample of 695 randomly selected posts. Frequencies and percentages of posts containing each coded theme were assessed along with the number of upvotes and comments.

resultsPost volume increased across all subreddits over time, spiking from August - September of 2019 when vaping lung injury emerged. Just over 52% of posts discussed seeking social support and 16.83% discussed providing social support. Posts providing support received the most positive engagements (i.e. upvotes) of all coded categories. Posts also discussed physical and psychological symptoms of withdrawal (30.65% and 18.85%, respectively), strategies for quitting including: quitting cold turkey (38.33%), using alternative nicotine products (17%), and tapering down nicotine content (10.50%). Most posts shared a personal narrative (92.37%) and some discussed quit motivation (28.20%) and relapse (14.99%).

conclusionsThis work identifies a desire for peer-to-peer support for quitting vaping, which reinforces existing literature and highlights characteristics of quitting vaping specific to a changing nicotine product environment. Given that posts providing social support were the most upvoted, this suggests that subreddit contributors are seeking support from their peers when discussing quitting vaping. Additionally, this analysis shows the sharing of barriers and facilitators for quitting, supporting findings from prior exploration of quit vaping subreddits. Finally, quitting vaping in an ever-growing nicotine market has led to the evolution of vaping-specific quit methods such as tapering down nicotine content. These findings have direct implications for quit vaping product implementation and development.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationVapingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHumanscessationcessation programse-cigaretteelectronic cigarettepeer supportquitting vaping, social media, tobacco policysmokingsocial supportvaping

Identifiers

PMID39454194
PMCPMC11549585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.