ArticlePLoS genetics2024
The response to single-gene duplication implicates translation as a key vulnerability in aneuploid yeast.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards a unified model of aneuploid karyotype dynamics.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Chromosome duplication causes premature aging via defects in ribosome quality control.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Global modulation of gene expression and transcriptome size in aneuploid combinations of maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- On the rate of aneuploidy reversion in a wild yeast model.Genetics · 2025Article
- Investigating the role of RNA-binding protein Ssd1 in aneuploidy tolerance through network analysis.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Comparative modeling reveals the molecular determinants of aneuploidy fitness cost in a wild yeast model.Cell genomics · 2024Article
- Premature aging in aneuploid yeast is caused in part by aneuploidy-induced defects in Ribosome Quality Control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aneuploidy produces myriad consequences in health and disease, yet models of the deleterious effects of chromosome amplification are still widely debated. To distinguish the molecular determinants of aneuploidy stress, we measured the effects of duplicating individual genes in cells with different chromosome duplications, in wild-type cells (SSD1+) and cells sensitized to aneuploidy by deletion of RNA-binding protein Ssd1 (ssd1Δ). We identified gene duplications that are nearly neutral in wild-type euploid cells but significantly deleterious in euploids lacking SSD1 or in SSD1+ aneuploid cells with different chromosome duplications. Several of the most deleterious genes are linked to translation. In contrast, duplication of other genes benefits multiple ssd1Δ aneuploids over controls, and this group is enriched for translational effectors. Furthermore, both wild-type and especially ssd1Δ aneuploids with different chromosome amplifications show increased sensitivity to translational inhibitor nourseothricin. We used comparative modeling of aneuploid growth defects, based on the cumulative fitness costs measured for single-gene duplication. Our results present a model in which the deleterious effects of aneuploidy emerge from an interaction between the cumulative burden of many amplified genes on a chromosome and a subset of duplicated genes that become toxic in that context. These findings provide a perspective on the dual impact of individual genes and overall genomic burden, offering new avenues for understanding aneuploidy and its cellular consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.