ArticlePloS one2024
Risk-enhancing factors and social determinants of health in risk assessment for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Pooled Cohort Equations (PCEs) do not accurately estimate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in certain populations. The 2018 AHA/ACC cholesterol guideline identified risk-enhancing factors as a supplement to PCEs-based risk assessment. However, the role of each risk-enhancing factor in ASCVD risk assessment has not been well quantified. Further, social determinants of health (SDOH) are not included in the PCEs nor considered as risk-enhancing factors in the US cholesterol guideline. We sought to evaluate ASCVD risk associated with each risk-enhancing factor and commonly collected SDOH including education, income, and employment status, and to assess if adding risk-enhancing factors and SDOH to the PCEs improve ASCVD risk prediction.
methodsWe included individuals aged 40 to 75 years, without ASCVD or diabetes at baseline, and with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 70-189 mg/dL from two contemporary prospective cohort studies (MESA and REGARDS) and from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). The primary endpoint was incident ASCVD defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, or fatal or nonfatal stroke over a 10-year period (median follow-up 10 years). We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate associations between risk-enhancing factors and SDOH with ASCVD. We also assessed changes in model performance after adding risk-enhancing factors and SDOH to the PCEs.
resultsWe included 13,863 adults (mean age 60.7 years) from the prospective cohorts and 307,931 adults (mean age 54.8 years) from KPSC. Risk-enhancing factors including hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, metabolic syndrome, and chronic kidney disease were associated with a higher ASCVD risk, independent of 10-year risk estimated by the PCEs. Low education, low income, and unemployment were also associated with higher ASCVD risk. While adding individual risk-enhancing factors or SDOH to the PCEs had limited impact on model performance, adding multiple risk-enhancing factors and SDOH simultaneously led to modest improvements in discrimination (C-index increased by up to 0.07), calibration (integrated Brier score reduced by up to 2.3%), and net reclassification improvement up to 41.4%.
conclusionsThese findings suggest including SDOH and risk-enhancing factors may improve ASCVD risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.