Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39453940›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Guidelines for the prescription of standard hematology and biochemistry clinical laboratory tests in the intensive care unit: A scoping review protocol.

Luigi L Devis, Emilie Catry, Michael Hardy, Alexandre Mansour, Patrick M Honore, Giuseppe Lippi, Mélanie Closset, François Mullier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luigi L DevisBiochemistry, Department of Laboratory Medicine, CHU UCL Namur, UCLouvain, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4576-0057
Emilie CatryBiochemistry, Department of Laboratory Medicine, CHU UCL Namur, UCLouvain, Belgium.
Michael HardyInstitute for Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC), UCLouvain, Belgium.
Alexandre MansourDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Pontchaillou University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Patrick M HonoreDepartment of Intensive Care, CHU UCL Namur, UCLouvain, Belgium.
Giuseppe LippiSection of Clinical Biochemistry and School of Medicine, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9523-9054
Mélanie ClossetBiochemistry, Department of Laboratory Medicine, CHU UCL Namur, UCLouvain, Belgium.
François MullierInstitute for Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC), UCLouvain, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis scoping review protocol describes the strategy for a scoping review that aims to provide a comprehensive overview of published guidelines for the prescription of standard laboratory tests performed in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

backgroundThe use of clinical laboratories is constantly increasing. However, there is evidence of inappropriate use. Inappropriate laboratory testing has the potential to harm patients, increase costs, burden staff, and has an environmental impact. Effective management can be achieved through demand managing strategies, such as providing guidelines on performing the appropriate test, for the right patient, at the right time. Although national and international guidelines exist for individual tests, a comprehensive summary of available recommendations for laboratory testing in the ICU is currently unavailable. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This scoping review will incorporate documents that provide explicit advice on which test to perform in ICU patients. We selected 34 tests routinely ordered in the ICU. This review will consider any document type that matches our concept and context. We will consider gray literature with appropriate adherence to guidelines methodology. We will not limit the review by geographical location, but will only include articles published in English. SEARCH STRATEGY: Our scoping review will follow the Joanna Brigg Institute (JBI) methodology. We will search Medline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Google. Our search strategy adheres to the JBI 3-step construction approach for systematic reviews. We will search for keywords related to guidelines, laboratory testing, and the 34 selected tests. We will report our study using the S1 Checklist. Review registration number: osf.io/yfs9z.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsClinical Laboratory TechniquesHematologic TestsHumansLaboratories, ClinicalPractice Guidelines as TopicScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39453940
PMCPMC11508088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.