Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39453905›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Prescription of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in outpatient care in Bavaria: An analysis of routine data.

Thomas Hanslmeier, Sahera Alsaiad, Susann Hueber, Peter K Kurotschka, Roman Gerlach, Ildikó Gágyor, Yvonne Kaußner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas HanslmeierDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-4042-5786
Sahera AlsaiadDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany.
Susann HueberInstitute of General Practice, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany.
Peter K KurotschkaDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany.
Roman GerlachKassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns (KVB), Bavaria, Germany.
Ildikó GágyorDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany.
Yvonne KaußnerDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4830-3647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with urinary tract infection (UTI) in German outpatient care are usually treated by general practitioners (GPs), as well as by other specialties. To prevent antibiotic resistances and side effects, German guidelines recommend fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, pivmecillinam and nitroxoline as first-line treatments, and advice against broad-spectrum antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins. However, data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control indicates a significant proportion of second-line antibiotics in German outpatient care. Our aim was to analyze whether antibiotic prescription has changed over time in accordance with guidelines. In addition, we aimed to investigate whether specialties prescribe different antibiotics for UTIs and whether prescription varies according to patient age and sex. For patients receiving more than one antibiotic, we wanted to determine whether subsequent prescriptions show a change in substances and specialties involved.

methodsThis retrospective study involved routine data (2013 to 2019) provided by the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. Data on diagnoses and prescriptions were transmitted from outpatient care physicians on a quarterly basis. UTI patients ≥12 years were included.

resultsWe analyzed 1.7 million UTI prescription cases. In females, shares of fluoroquinolones decreased sharply over time, while shares of first-line substances fosfomycin and pivmecillinam increased. Gynecologists showed the highest shares of first-line substances compared to GPs and urologists. Fluoroquinolone shares decreased in all three specialty groups. In females, older patients showed lower shares of first-line substances than younger patients. If a second or third antibiotic was prescribed, fosfomycin shares decreased, while shares of nitrofurantoin, nitroxoline and cephalosporins increased.

conclusionsOur findings show a trend towards a more guideline-adherent prescribing in the treatment of UTI, with a significant increase of shares of fosfomycin and pivmecillinam, especially in women, and a sharp decrease of shares of fluoroquinolones.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycinUrinary Tract InfectionsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmdinocillin PivoxilCephalosporinsChildDrug PrescriptionsFemaleFluoroquinolonesGermanyHumansAmdinocillin PivoxilAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsFluoroquinolonesFosfomycinNitrofurantoinNitroquinolinesnitroxoline

Identifiers

PMID39453905
PMCPMC11508671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.