ArticleJAMA network open2024
Male Gender Expressivity and Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease Risks in Men.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discordance in gender role attitudes between spouses and its relationship with the risk biomarkers of cardiovascular diseases: a couple-level analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Life-Course Suicide Rates by State Firearm Policy Environment.American journal of preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Hypertension Types and Associated Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Lithuanians Aged 50-54 Years.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Global, regional, and national burden of early-onset ischemic heart disease: trends and projections among adults aged 15-44 years from 1990 to 2046.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of Obesity as a Cardiac Disease Risk Factor in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Sociocultural Considerations in Heart Failure Self-Care Readiness: A Thematic Analysis.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Male gender expressivity (MGE), which reflects prevalent sociocultural pressures to convey masculinity, has been associated with health. Yet, little is known about associations of MGE with the diagnosis and treatment of modifiable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks. Objective: To investigate associations of MGE with modifiable CVD risk diagnoses and treatment in men. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study included data from waves I (1994-1995), IV (2008-2009), and V (2016-2018) of the US National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health). Participants were male adolescents (age 12-18 years) followed up longitudinally through younger adulthood (age 24-32 years) and adulthood (age 32-42 years). Data were analyzed from January 5, 2023, to August 28, 2024. Exposure: Male gender expressivity was quantified in adolescence and younger adulthood using an empirically-derived and validated measurement technique that incorporates participants' responses to existing Add Health survey items to capture how similarly participants behave to same-gendered peers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included self-reported diagnoses of CVD risk conditions (hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia) in adult men with elevated blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and self-reported treatment with antihypertensive, hypoglycemic, or lipid-lowering medications in adults reporting hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia. Multivariable regression was used to examine associations of adolescent and younger adult MGE with adult CVD risk diagnoses and treatment, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates. Results: Among 4230 eligible male participants, most were non-Hispanic White (2711 [64%]) and privately insured (3338 [80%]). Their mean (SD) age was 16.14 (1.81) years in adolescence, 29.02 (1.84) years in younger adulthood, and 38.10 (1.95) years in adulthood. Compared with participants whose younger adult MGE was below average, those with higher younger adult MGE were overall less likely to report hypertension (22% vs 26%; P < .001), diabetes (5% vs 8%; P < .001), and hyperlipidemia (19% vs 24%; P < .001) diagnoses and diabetes treatment (3% vs 5%; P = .02) as adults. In multivariable models, every SD increase in adolescent MGE was associated with lower probabilities of adult hypertension treatment (MGE,-0.11; 95% CI, -0.16 to -0.6) and diabetes diagnoses (MGE, -0.15; 95% CI, -0.27 to -0.03). Higher younger adult MGE was associated with lower probabilities of adult hypertension diagnoses (MGE, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01), hypertension treatment (MGE, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.01), and diabetes treatment (MGE, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.01). Adolescent and younger adult MGE outcomes were not associated with other adult CVD outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of US males, higher adolescent and younger adult MGE was associated with lower adult hypertension and diabetes diagnoses and treatment. These findings suggest that males with high MGE may bear distinctive risks and correspondingly benefit from tailored public health efforts to prevent downstream CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.