ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2024
Impact of Milk pH and Fat Content on the Prediction of Milk-to-Plasma Ratio: Knowledge Gap and Considerations for Lactation Study Design and Interpretation.
Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Mechanistic Distribution Model for Predicting Drug Partitioning into Human Milk.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- PBPK-Based Prediction of Oliceridine Exposure in Breast Milk and Relative Infant Dose During the First 24 h After Cesarean Delivery.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Predicting Cumulative Neonatal Sodium Benzoate Exposures During Breastfeeding with Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Application of Lactation Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict Milk Exposure of Passively Diffused Drugs.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Postpartum changes in maternal physiology and milk composition: a comprehensive database for developing lactation physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveDifferent empirical lactation models have been published to predict the milk-to-plasma (M/P) ratio of drugs to gain knowledge on the extent of drug distribution to the breastmilk. M/P ratios will likely vary across the lactation period due to differences in physiological milk pH and fat content, which are not routinely reported in clinical lactation pharmacokinetic studies. This work aims to evaluate the sensitivity of two (a theory-based phase distribution and a log-transformed regression) lactation models for M/P prediction at different physiological milk pH and fat content.
methodsA literature search was conducted to collate reported M/P ratios for different drugs and their physicochemical parameters required for the prediction of the M/P ratio. Two distribution models were used for M/P ratio predictions. The M/P ratio of drugs was predicted under the physiological milk pHs of 6.8, 7.0, 7.2, and 7.4 and at of 1%, 3%, and 6% fat content. Calculated M/P ratios were compared with the observed M/P ratios.
resultsA total of 200 M/P ratios for 130 compounds (40 acids and 90 bases) were collected from clinical studies and included in the analysis. For both model, precision decreases and bias increases outside the milk pH range 7.0-7.2 and fat contents more than 3%. Significant variability exists in the observed M/P ratios. Both milk pH and fat content are important parameters for model prediction.
conclusionCalculated M/P ratios are influenced by multiple covariates, including milk pH and fat content. The phase distribution model is less sensitive to these covariates than the log-transformed model, especially for acidic compounds. For complex matrices such as breastmilk, the actual physiological parameters of the sampled milk, at least milk fat and pH, and their distributions are required covariates to improve the prediction outcomes, design lactation pharmacokinetic studies, and inform the potential breastfed infant dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39453598What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.