ReviewPlant cell reports2024
CRISPR/Cas system-mediated base editing in crops: recent developments and future prospects.
Review in Plant cell reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uracil-DNA Glycosylase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Haploid Production inBiology · 2025Review
- Review
- Genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) genome-editing system has altered plant research by allowing for targeted genome alteration, and they are emerging as powerful tools for evaluating plant gene function and improving crop yield. Even though CRISPR/Cas9 cleavage and subsequent repair are effective ways to precisely replace genes and change base pairs in plants, the dominance of the non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) and homology-directed repair's (HDR) poor effectiveness in plant cells have restricted their use. Base editing is gaining popularity as a potential alternative to HDR or NHEJ-mediated replacement, allowing for precise changes in the plant genome via programmed conversion of a single base to another without the need for a donor repair template or double-stranded breaks. In this review, we primarily present the mechanisms of base-editing system, including their distinct types such as DNA base editors (cytidine base editor and adenine base editor) and RNA base editors discovered so far. Next, we outline the current potential applications of the base-editing system for crop improvements. Finally, we discuss the limitations and potential future directions of the base-editing system in terms of improving crop quality. We hope that this review will enable the researcher to gain knowledge about base-editing tools and their potential applications in crop improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39453560What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.