ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Evaluating and enhancing the robustness of vision transformers against adversarial attacks in medical imaging.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have demonstrated exceptional performance in medical image analysis. However, recent studies have uncovered significant vulnerabilities in DNN models, particularly their susceptibility to adversarial attacks that manipulate these models into making inaccurate predictions. Vision Transformers (ViTs), despite their advanced capabilities in medical imaging tasks, have not been thoroughly evaluated for their robustness against such attacks in this domain. This study addresses this research gap by conducting an extensive analysis of various adversarial attacks on ViTs specifically within medical imaging contexts. We explore adversarial training as a potential defense mechanism and assess the resilience of ViT models against state-of-the-art adversarial attacks and defense strategies using publicly available benchmark medical image datasets. Our findings reveal that ViTs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks even with minimal perturbations, although adversarial training significantly enhances their robustness, achieving over 80% classification accuracy. Additionally, we perform a comparative analysis with state-of-the-art convolutional neural network models, highlighting the unique strengths and weaknesses of ViTs in handling adversarial threats. This research advances the understanding of ViTs robustness in medical imaging and provides insights into their practical deployment in real-world scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39453557What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.