Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39453508›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2024

ANPS: machine learning based server for identification of anti-nutritional proteins in plants.

Sanchita Naha, Sarvjeet Kaur, Ramcharan Bhattacharya, Srinivasulu Cheemanapalli, Yuvaraj Iyyappan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanchita NahaDivision of Computer Applications, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Sarvjeet KaurICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Pusa, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Ramcharan BhattacharyaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Pusa, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Srinivasulu CheemanapalliRegional Ayurveda Research Institute (CCRAS, Govt. of India), Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
Yuvaraj IyyappanICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Pusa, New Delhi, 110012, India. yuvaraj.i@icar.gov.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-nutrient factors are inherently present in almost all major crops, which impede the absorption of crucial vitamins and minerals upon human consumption. The commonly found anti-nutrients in food crops are saponins, tannins, lectins, and phytates etc. Currently, there is a lack of computational server for identification of proteins that encode for anti-nutritional factors in plants. Consequently, this study represents a computational approach aimed at distinguishing between proteins encoding anti-nutritional factors and those providing essential nutrients. In this work, machine learning algorithms have been employed to identify plant specific anti-nutrient factor proteins from protein sequences by using compositional features. Achieving a five-fold cross-validation training performance of 94.34% AUC-ROC and 94.13% AUC-PR with extreme gradient boosting surpasses the performance of other methods such as support vector machine, random forest, and adaptive boosting. These results suggest the proposed approach is highly reliable in predicting plant-specific anti-nutritional factor proteins. The resulting prediction models have led to the development of an online server named ANPS, freely available at https://nipb-bi.icar.gov.in .

Indexed as

Machine LearningPlant ProteinsAlgorithmsSoftwareSupport Vector MachinePlant ProteinsANPSAnti-nutrientsMachine learningPredictionWeb server

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.