Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39453490›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2024

Interventions to reduce low-value care in intensive care settings: a scoping review of impacts on health, resource use, costs, and the environment.

Jake T W Williams, Florencia Moraga Masson, Forbes McGain, Rachel Stancliffe, Julia K Pilowsky, Nhi Nguyen, Katy J L Bell

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Environmental sustainability evidence in critical care medicine: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jake T W WilliamsFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. jake.williams@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8394-2682
Florencia Moraga MassonFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Forbes McGainFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rachel StancliffeCentre for Sustainable Healthcare, Oxford, OX2 7DL, UK.
Julia K PilowskyAgency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Nhi NguyenAgency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Katy J L BellFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney SC4167National Health and Medical Research Council 2019/GNT1174523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLow-value care is common in intensive care units (ICUs), unnecessarily exposing patients to risks and harms, incuring costs to the patient and healthcare system, and contributing to healthcare's carbon footprint. We aimed to identify, collate, and summarise published evidence on the impact of interventions to reduce low-value care in ICUs.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to 22 September 2023 for evaluations of interventions aiming to reduce low-value care, supplemented by reference lists and recently published articles. We recorded impacts on the low-value target, health outcomes, resource use, cost, and the environment.

resultsFrom 1155 studies screened, 32 eligible studies were identified evaluating interventions to reduce: routine blood testing (n = 13), routine chest X-rays (n = 10), and other types (or multiple types) of low-value care (n = 9). All but 3 of the interventions found reductions in the immediate low-value care target (usually the primary outcome). Although the small sample size of most included studies, limited their ability to detect impacts on other outcomes, many interventions were also associated with improved health outcomes and financial savings. The only study that reported environmental impacts found the intervention was associated with reduced carbon dioxide equivalent (CO

conclusionsInterventions to reduce low-value care in ICUs may have important health, financial, and environmental co-benefits. Further research may inform wider scale-up and sustainability of successful strategies to decrease low-value healthcare. More empirical evidence on potential environmental benefits may inform policies to lower healthcare's carbon footprint.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsCarbon FootprintCritical CareHumansCostEnvironmental impactHealth outcomesIntensive careLow-value careReview

Identifiers

PMID39453490
PMCPMC11588958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.