ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Understanding patient experiences to improve care for females groin hernia.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThousands of females undergo inguinal hernia repair annually, yet females have been excluded from prior clinical trials evaluating inguinal hernia repairs. Research shows females face worse outcomes after hernia repair compared to males, including higher recurrence rates, increased chronic pain, and limited data to guide treatment. Prospective studies focused on optimizing outcomes for females are critically needed. Prior to conducting such trials, it is essential to obtain preliminary data from female participants to ensure that the studies are designed appropriately to address their priorities and improve sex disparities in outcomes.
methodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted between July 7 and December 31, 2023, with 34 females evaluated for groin hernia. Interviews were conducted via Zoom at an academic medical center. The discussions aimed to explore the challenges in diagnosing hernias, the considerations for selecting treatment options, and the priorities for future research. The transcripts were analyzed using descriptive content analysis, facilitated by MAXQDA software.
resultsDiagnostic challenges included delayed recognition due to underappreciation of female hernias. Participants desired greater familiarity with hernias and treatment options from providers. For surgical decisions, fear of complications drove some towards surgery, while others prioritized avoiding recovery time for asymptomatic hernias. Participants called for research on female-specific risk factors, pain experiences, recovery impacts, and non-operative approaches. The majority of participants agreed or considered participating and serving as an advisor in a future study.
conclusionFemales with hernia face sex-based disparities in diagnosis and treatment. Improving provider awareness and developing guidelines are needed. This qualitative study identifies key areas for future research to optimize person-centered hernia care for females based directly on personal perspectives and priorities, laying the groundwork for prospective trials aimed at improving outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.