ArticleToxins2024
Effect of Gossypol on Gene Expression in Swine Granulosa Cells.
Article in Toxins, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of animal models on translating male infertility research from bench to bedside: a narrative review.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Review
- Effects of Gossypol Exposure on Ovarian Reserve Function: Comprehensive Risk Assessment Based on TRAEC Strategy.Toxics · 2025Article
- Peroxiredoxin 6 in Stress Orchestration and Disease Interplay.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gossypol (GP), a polyphenolic compound in cottonseed, has notable effects on female reproduction and the respiratory system in pigs. This study aimed to discern the alterations in gene expression within swine granulosa cells (GCs) when treated with two concentrations of GP (6.25 and 12.5 µM) for 72 h, in vitro. The analysis revealed significant changes in the expression of numerous genes in the GP-treated groups. A Gene Ontology analysis highlighted that the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) primarily pertained to processes such as the mitotic cell cycle, chromosome organization, centromeric region, and protein binding. Pathway analysis using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) indicated distinct impacts on various pathways in response to different GP concentrations. Specifically, in the GP6.25 group, pathways related to the cycle oocyte meiosis, progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation, and p53 signaling were prominently affected. Meanwhile, in the GP12.5 group, pathways associated with PI3K-Akt signaling, focal adhesion, HIF-1 signaling, cell cycle, and ECM-receptor interaction showed significant alterations. Notably, genes linked to female reproductive function (CDK1, CCNB1, CPEB1, MMP3), cellular component organization (BIRC5, CYP1A1, TGFB3, COL1A2), and oxidation-reduction processes (PRDX6, MGST1, SOD3) exhibited differential expression in GP-treated groups. These findings offer valuable insights into the changes in GC gene expression in pigs exposed to GP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.