ArticleToxins2024
Real-World Use of Intradetrusor Botulinum Toxin Injections: A Population-Based Study from France.
Article in Toxins, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Patterns of Botulinum Toxin Treatment in Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders: A 9-Year Nationwide Analysis in France.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026Article
- Review
- Trends and off-label use of botulinum toxin type A in Chinese neurological practice from 2016 to 2023: a real-world study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Botulinum toxin A for post-stroke spasticity: Insights from the French National Hospital Discharge Database (2015-2023).European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Botulinum toxin A for post-stroke spasticity: Insights from the French National Hospital Discharge Database (2015-2023).European stroke journal · 2025Article
- Urodynamic Predictive Factors for Successful Treatment Outcomes Following Intravesical Botulinum Toxin a Injection in Patients with Detrusor Overactivity.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent decades, intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) have been widely applied to treat incontinence in both idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB) and neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence (NDOI). This analysis, based on the French National Hospital Discharge Database (PMSI), aims to describe real-world trends in intradetrusor BoNT-A use between 2014 and 2022. Among 32,864 patients who received at least one intradetrusor BoNT-A injection, 18,320 (55.7%) had conditions coded under iOAB, 13,376 (40.7%) under NDOI, and 1168 (3.6%) under other indications. The overall mean interval between two intradetrusor BoNT-A injections was 9.7 months, ranging from 8.7 months in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) to 11.5 months in patients with cerebral pathologies. The median number of injections was two (quartile 1-quartile 3, 1-4) in patients with spina bifida, whereas it was five (2-10) in those with MS. Only 31% of patients with iOAB received more than two intradetrusor BoNT-A injections. Regardless of its indication, BoNT-A was well tolerated. Adverse events occurring during or requiring hospitalization included infections (3.8%), hematuria (0.53%), and bleeding episodes necessitating transfusions (0.11%), all recorded within the initial month following BoNT-A injection. Our analysis of the PMSI database highlights a broad spectrum of intradetrusor BoNT-A injection practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.