Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39452698›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Is Short-Read 16S rRNA Sequencing of Oral Microbiome Sampling a Suitable Diagnostic Tool for Head and Neck Cancer?

Kenny Yeo, Fangmeinuo Wu, Runhao Li, Eric Smith, Peter-John Wormald, Rowan Valentine, Alkis James Psaltis, Sarah Vreugde, Kevin Fenix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kenny YeoDiscipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5733-0463
Fangmeinuo WuDiscipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Runhao LiDiscipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5577-049X
Eric SmithDiscipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2958-3492
Peter-John WormaldDepartment of Surgery-Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Rowan ValentineDepartment of Surgery-Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide and the Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia.
Alkis James PsaltisDiscipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Sarah VreugdeDiscipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Kevin FenixDepartment of Surgery-Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide and the Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1619-1406

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1196832Ray and Shirl Norman Cancer Research Trust Project Grant NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The oral microbiome, studied by sampling the saliva or by oral rinse, has been long thought to have diagnostic capacity for head and neck cancers (HNC). However, previous reports on the HNC oral microbiome provide inconsistent results. The aim of this study is to consolidate these datasets and determine the oral microbial composition between HNC patients to healthy and premalignant individuals. We analyzed 16 published head and neck cancer (HNC) short-read 16S rRNA sequencing datasets, specifically targeting the V3V4, V4 and V4V5 regions. These datasets included saliva and oral rinse samples from donors with HNC, as well as from healthy and premalignant donors. Differences in diversities and microbial abundance were determined. HNC saliva displayed lower alpha diversity than healthy donors. In contrast, the opposite trend was observed for oral rinse samples. Beta diversity scores were largely similar across different patient types. Similar oral phyla were detected for all samples, but proportions were largely dependent on sample type (i.e., saliva or oral rinse) and primer set utilized for 16S rRNA sequencing.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMicrobiotaMouthRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalivaBacteriaDNA, BacterialHumansSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S ribosomal RNAhead and neck canceroral microbiomeoral rinsesaliva

Identifiers

PMID39452698
PMCPMC11510575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.