Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39452563›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

Pain after Licorice or Sugar-Water Gargling in Patients Recovering from Oropharyngeal Surgery-A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

Marita Windpassinger, Michal Prusak, Jana Gemeiner, Olga Plattner, Stefan Janik, Gerold Besser, Wolfgang Gstoettner, Pu Xuan, Daniel I Sessler, Kurt Ruetzler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marita WindpassingerDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8568-4194
Michal PrusakDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Jana GemeinerDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0006-5338-1152
Olga PlattnerDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Stefan JanikDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1161-4871
Gerold BesserDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang GstoettnerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Pu XuanDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinics, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Daniel I SesslerOutcomes Research Consortium, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9932-3077
Kurt RuetzlerOutcomes Research Consortium, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0467-1736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlycyrrhiza glabrata (licorice) is used in traditional medicine and herbal remedies and reduces sore throats consequent to intubation, but whether it is protective for more intense pain after oropharyngeal surgery remains unclear. We thus tested the joint hypothesis that gargling with licorice, which has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, reduces postoperative pain and morphine consumption.

methodsWe enrolled patients having elective oropharyngeal surgery. Participants were randomly allocated to gargle with either 1 g licorice or a sugar placebo before and for up to three days after surgery. A numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain along with morphine consumption was evaluated every 30 min during the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and then three times daily for three days. We pre-specified that licorice gargling would be deemed better than sugar gargling only if found non-inferior on both morphine consumption and pain score and superior on at least one of the two.

results65 patients were randomized to the licorice group and 61 to placebo. We found noninferiority (NI) in pain scores with an estimated mean difference of -0.09 (95.2% CI: -0.88, 0.70;

conclusionsGargling with licorice did not significantly or meaningfully reduce postoperative pain or morphine consumption in patients recovering from oropharyngeal surgery. While higher doses might prove more effective, our results suggest that other topical analgesics should be considered.

Indexed as

analgesiaanesthesiagarglinglicoriceoropharyngeal surgerypain managementpostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID39452563
PMCPMC11508901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.