Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39452561›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024

The Potential Use of Targeted Proteomics and Metabolomics for the Identification and Monitoring of Diabetic Kidney Disease.

Nele Van Roy, Marijn M Speeckaert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nele Van RoyDepartment of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Marijn M SpeeckaertDepartment of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9183-4390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus and is associated with a significantly worse prognosis compared to diabetic patients without kidney involvement, other microvascular complications, or non-diabetic chronic kidney disease, due to its higher risk of cardiovascular events, faster progression to end-stage kidney disease, and increased mortality. In clinical practice, diagnosis is based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria. However, given the limitations of these diagnostic markers, novel biomarkers must be identified. Omics is a new field of study involving the comprehensive analysis of various types of biological data at the molecular level. In different fields, they have shown promising results in (early) detection of diseases, personalized medicine, therapeutic monitoring, and understanding pathogenesis. DKD is primarily utilized in scientific research and has not yet been implemented in routine clinical practice. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of currently available data on targeted omics. After an extensive literature search, 25 different (panels of) omics were withheld and analyzed. Both serum/plasma and urine proteomics and metabolomics have been described with varying degrees of evidence. For all omics, there is still a relative paucity of data from large, prospective, longitudinal cohorts, presumably because of the heterogeneity of DKD and the lack of patient selection in studies, the complexity of omics technologies, and various practical and ethical considerations (e.g., limited accessibility, cost, and privacy concerns).

Indexed as

CKD273diabetic kidney diseasediabetic nephropathymetabolomicsmulti-omicsproteomics

Identifiers

PMID39452561
PMCPMC11508375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.