ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024
Impact of Scleral Lenses on Visual Acuity and Ocular Aberrations in Corneal Ectasia: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of pad wetness on health-related quality of life after radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder.World journal of urology · 2025Trial
- Refractive Surprises After Cataract Surgery: Identification and Management in Optometric Practice- A Comprehensive Review.Clinical optometry · 2026Review
- Impact of contact lens correction on wavefront aberrations and vision quality in keratoconus.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Review
- Myopia in Children: Epidemiology, Genetics, and Emerging Therapies for Treatment and Prevention.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Decoding Cone Morphology in Keratoconus: A Retrospective Study on Contact Lens Selection in Turkish Patients.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Corneal ectasias, including keratoconus (KC), pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), and post-LASIK ectasia, poses significant visual rehabilitation challenges due to the resultant irregular astigmatism, myopia, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs). These conditions often resist traditional corrective methods, necessitating advanced optical solutions. Scleral lenses (SLs) have emerged as a primary non-surgical option for managing these complex corneal irregularities. SLs form a smooth optical interface by forming a tear-filled chamber between the lens and the cornea, effectively mitigating HOAs and improving both high-contrast and low-contrast visual acuity (VA). This review evaluates the efficacy of SLs in enhancing VA and reducing aberrations in patients with corneal ectasia. It also explores the technological advancements in SLs, such as profilometry and wavefront-guided systems, which enable more precise and customized lens fittings by accurately mapping the eye's surface and addressing specific visual aberrations. The current body of evidence demonstrates that custom SLs significantly improve visual outcomes across various ectatic conditions, offering superior performance compared to conventional correction methods. However, challenges such as the complexity of fitting and the need for precise alignment remain. Ongoing innovations in SL technology and customization are likely to further enhance their clinical utility, solidifying their role as an indispensable tool in the management of corneal ectasias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.