Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39452539›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024

Normalising the Implementation of Pharmacogenomic (PGx) Testing in Adult Mental Health Settings: A Theory-Based Systematic Review.

Adam Jameson, Justine Tomlinson, Kristina Medlinskiene, Dane Howard, Imran Saeed, Jaspreet Sohal, Caroline Dalton, Gurdeep S Sagoo, Alastair Cardno, Greg C Bristow and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Genomics in Health and Biomedicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adam JamesonBradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford BD18 3LD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-2302
Justine TomlinsonSchool of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.
Kristina MedlinskieneSchool of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.
Dane HowardSchool of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.
Imran SaeedSchool of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.
Jaspreet SohalBradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford BD18 3LD, UK.
Caroline DaltonBiomolecular Sciences Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1404-873X
Gurdeep S SagooPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE2 4HH, UK.
Alastair CardnoLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LH, UK.
Greg C BristowSchool of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.
Beth FylanSchool of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0599-4537
Samantha L McLeanSchool of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9328-8928

Funding

Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing can help personalise psychiatric prescribing and improve on the currently adopted trial-and-error prescribing approach. However, widespread implementation is yet to occur. Understanding factors influencing implementation is pertinent to the psychiatric PGx field. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) seeks to understand the work involved during intervention implementation and is used by this review (PROSPERO: CRD42023399926) to explore factors influencing PGx implementation in psychiatry. Four databases were systematically searched for relevant records and assessed for eligibility following PRISMA guidance. The QuADS tool was applied during quality assessment of included records. Using an abductive approach to codebook thematic analysis, barrier and facilitator themes were developed using NPT as a theoretical framework. Twenty-nine records were included in the data synthesis. Key barrier themes included a PGx knowledge gap, a lack of consensus in policy and guidance, and uncertainty towards the use of PGx. Facilitator themes included an interest in PGx use as a new and improved approach to prescribing, a desire for a multidisciplinary approach to PGx implementation, and the importance of fostering a climate for PGx implementation. Using NPT, this novel review systematically summarises the literature in the psychiatric PGx implementation field. The findings highlight a need to develop national policies on using PGx, and an education and training workforce plan for mental health professionals. By understanding factors influencing implementation, the findings help to address the psychiatric PGx implementation gap. This helps move clinical practice closer towards a personalised psychotropic prescribing approach and associated improvements in patient outcomes. Future policy and research should focus on the appraisal of PGx implementation in psychiatry and the role of pharmacists in PGx service design, implementation, and delivery.

Indexed as

implementation sciencemental healthpersonalised medicinepersonalised prescribingPGx testingpharmacogeneticspharmacogenomicsprecision medicinepsychiatrysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39452539
PMCPMC11508855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.