ArticleDentistry journal2024
The Accuracy of Custom-Made Milled Metal Posts as Compared to Conventional Cast Metal Posts.
Article in Dentistry journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi-Digital, and Conventional.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Fracture strength evaluation for different posts in endodontically treated teeth.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Apical Gap, Adaptation, and Trueness of Direct and Indirect Customized Post-and-Core Restorations Fabricated by the Casting, Milling, and Selective Laser Melting Techniques.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to compare the fitting accuracy of custom-made metal posts and cores fabricated by half-digital and milling technique to that of conventional cast posts fabricated by direct technique.
methodsSixteen extracted single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated followed by post space preparation. A direct resin post and core pattern was made for each tooth and used for the fabrication of two posts (n = 16). Each post resin pattern was digitized with a laboratory scanner and used for the fabrication of a milled cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) alloy post, while the direct resin pattern, after scanning, was cast in a Co-Cr alloy to produce a cast post. Each post was seated on its respective tooth and evaluated using microcomputed tomography. The following variables were evaluated: total space volume between the post and root canal, the volume and distance of the apical gap between each post and the remaining apical root canal filling, as well as the distance and surface area of the space between the post and lateral root canal wall at four determined points along the length of each post.
resultsThe results revealed that half-digital and milled posts had a statistically significantly higher total space volume (
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that the fitting accuracy of cast posts was more accurate than posts fabricated with half-digital and milling technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.