Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39452415›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2024

Image Analysis in Histopathology and Cytopathology: From Early Days to Current Perspectives.

Tibor Mezei, Melinda Kolcsár, András Joó, Simona Gurzu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tibor MezeiDepartment of Pathology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5150-7993
Melinda KolcsárDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0628-035X
András JoóAccenture Romania, 540035 Targu Mures, Romania.
Simona GurzuDepartment of Pathology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3968-5118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both pathology and cytopathology still rely on recognizing microscopical morphologic features, and image analysis plays a crucial role, enabling the identification, categorization, and characterization of different tissue types, cell populations, and disease states within microscopic images. Historically, manual methods have been the primary approach, relying on expert knowledge and experience of pathologists to interpret microscopic tissue samples. Early image analysis methods were often constrained by computational power and the complexity of biological samples. The advent of computers and digital imaging technologies challenged the exclusivity of human eye vision and brain computational skills, transforming the diagnostic process in these fields. The increasing digitization of pathological images has led to the application of more objective and efficient computer-aided analysis techniques. Significant advancements were brought about by the integration of digital pathology, machine learning, and advanced imaging technologies. The continuous progress in machine learning and the increasing availability of digital pathology data offer exciting opportunities for the future. Furthermore, artificial intelligence has revolutionized this field, enabling predictive models that assist in diagnostic decision making. The future of pathology and cytopathology is predicted to be marked by advancements in computer-aided image analysis. The future of image analysis is promising, and the increasing availability of digital pathology data will invariably lead to enhanced diagnostic accuracy and improved prognostic predictions that shape personalized treatment strategies, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.

Indexed as

cytopathologydigital image analysismicroscopypathology

Identifiers

PMID39452415
PMCPMC11508754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.