ArticleJournal of imaging2024
Joint Image Processing with Learning-Driven Data Representation and Model Behavior for Non-Intrusive Anemia Diagnosis in Pediatric Patients.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Machine Learning in Noninvasive Anemia Diagnosis: A Systematic Review Based on Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Development of an anemia detection model in emergency departments using lip region images based on medical knowledge and deep learning technology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Neural Computing Advancements in Cardiac Imaging: A Review of Deep Learning Approaches for Heart Disease Diagnosis.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Meets Nail Diagnostics: Emerging Image-Based Sensing Platforms for Non-Invasive Disease Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Neural Frontier of Future Medical Imaging: A Review of Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Detection.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anemia diagnosis is crucial for pediatric patients due to its impact on growth and development. Traditional methods, like blood tests, are effective but pose challenges, such as discomfort, infection risk, and frequent monitoring difficulties, underscoring the need for non-intrusive diagnostic methods. In light of this, this study proposes a novel method that combines image processing with learning-driven data representation and model behavior for non-intrusive anemia diagnosis in pediatric patients. The contributions of this study are threefold. First, it uses an image-processing pipeline to extract 181 features from 13 categories, with a feature-selection process identifying the most crucial data for learning. Second, a deep multilayered network based on long short-term memory (LSTM) is utilized to train a model for classifying images into anemic and non-anemic cases, where hyperparameters are optimized using Bayesian approaches. Third, the trained LSTM model is integrated as a layer into a learning model developed based on recurrent expansion rules, forming a part of a new deep network called a recurrent expansion network (RexNet). RexNet is designed to learn data representations akin to traditional deep-learning methods while also understanding the interaction between dependent and independent variables. The proposed approach is applied to three public datasets, namely conjunctival eye images, palmar images, and fingernail images of children aged up to 6 years. RexNet achieves an overall evaluation of 99.83 ± 0.02% across all classification metrics, demonstrating significant improvements in diagnostic results and generalization compared to LSTM networks and existing methods. This highlights RexNet's potential as a promising alternative to traditional blood-based methods for non-intrusive anemia diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.