Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39452406›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2024

Overview of High-Dynamic-Range Image Quality Assessment.

Yue Liu, Yu Tian, Shiqi Wang, Xinfeng Zhang, Sam Kwong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yue LiuDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3196-6866
Yu TianDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8147-8334
Shiqi WangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3583-959X
Xinfeng ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academic of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7517-3868
Sam KwongSchool of Data Sciences, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7484-7261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the High-Dynamic-Range (HDR) image has gained widespread popularity across various domains, such as the security, multimedia, and biomedical fields, owing to its ability to deliver an authentic visual experience. However, the extensive dynamic range and rich detail in HDR images present challenges in assessing their quality. Therefore, current efforts involve constructing subjective databases and proposing objective quality assessment metrics to achieve an efficient HDR Image Quality Assessment (IQA). Recognizing the absence of a systematic overview of these approaches, this paper provides a comprehensive survey of both subjective and objective HDR IQA methods. Specifically, we review 7 subjective HDR IQA databases and 12 objective HDR IQA metrics. In addition, we conduct a statistical analysis of 9 IQA algorithms, incorporating 3 perceptual mapping functions. Our findings highlight two main areas for improvement. Firstly, the size and diversity of HDR IQA subjective databases should be significantly increased, encompassing a broader range of distortion types. Secondly, objective quality assessment algorithms need to identify more generalizable perceptual mapping approaches and feature extraction methods to enhance their robustness and applicability. Furthermore, this paper aims to serve as a valuable resource for researchers by discussing the limitations of current methodologies and potential research directions in the future.

Indexed as

high dynamic rangeobjective image quality assessmentsubjective image quality assessment

Identifiers

PMID39452406
PMCPMC11508586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.