Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39452345›Full record

ArticleInsects2024

The Nutritional Quality of Commercially Bred Yellow Mealworm (

Isabelle Noyens, Meggie Van Peer, Sarah Goossens, Carmen Ter Heide, Sabine Van Miert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Influence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Upcycling Agri-Food Side-Streams viaFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Protein Extraction from Mealworm (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Effects ofFrontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabelle NoyensCentre of Expertise Sustainable Biomass and Chemistry, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2240 Geel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9139-5153
Meggie Van PeerCentre of Expertise Sustainable Biomass and Chemistry, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2240 Geel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0256-928X
Sarah GoossensCentre of Expertise Sustainable Biomass and Chemistry, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2240 Geel, Belgium.
Carmen Ter HeideCentre of Expertise Sustainable Biomass and Chemistry, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2240 Geel, Belgium.
Sabine Van MiertCentre of Expertise Sustainable Biomass and Chemistry, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2240 Geel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2328-3130

Funding

Interreg North West Europe NWE1004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to its potential as a sustainable protein source, the industrial relevance of

Indexed as

commercial insect productionfatnovel foodnutritional profileproteinyellow mealworm

Identifiers

PMID39452345
PMCPMC11508236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.