ArticleInsects2024
An Assessment Model for Agricultural Databases: The Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database as a Case Study.
Article in Insects, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Allelic Survey and Population Genomics in a Hotspot of Diflubenzuron Resistance in the MosquitoInsects · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Biocontrol Potential of Indigenous Soil Fungi: High-Performing Strains ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A claim for plant health as a key component of the one health concept.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Article
- SYNCAS based CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in predatory mites, whiteflies and stinkbugs.Insect biochemistry and molecular biology · 2025Article
- The genetic architecture of resistance to flubendiamide insecticide in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner).PloS one · 2025Article
- Polygenic response to selection by transgenic Bt-expressing crops in wild Helicoverpa zea and characterization of a major effect locus.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- A glutamate-gated chloride channel as the mite-specific target-site of dicofol and other diphenylcarbinol acaricides.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Intraspecific diversity in the mechanisms underlying abamectin resistance in a cosmopolitan pest.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Delaying quantitative resistance to pesticides and antibiotics.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Investigation of the spermathecal morphology, reproductive strategy and fate of stored spermatozoa in three important thysanopteran species.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Genome-enabled insights into the biology of thrips as crop pests.BMC biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a multi-method approach for evaluating the utility and impact of agricultural databases in the context of the rapidly expanding digital economy. Focusing on the Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database, one of the most comprehensive global resources on arthropod pesticide resistance, we offer a framework for assessing the effectiveness of agricultural databases. Our approach provides practical guidance for developers, users, evaluators, and funders on how to measure the impact of these digital tools, using relevant metrics and data to validate their contributions. Additionally, we introduce an index-based method that evaluates impact across multiple dimensions, including data usage, accessibility, inclusivity, knowledge generation, innovation, research and policy development, and collaboration. The detailed methodology serves as both a reference and a model for evaluating the impact of other agricultural databases, ensuring they effectively support decision-making and foster innovation in the agricultural sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.