ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2024
High-Sensitivity Troponin: Finding a Meaningful Delta.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the prognostic value of admission IL-8 and sST2 as biomarkers of early myocardial injury in severe community-acquired pneumonia.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of myocardial infarction in early presenters using 1-hour delta of high sensitive Troponin I: a pilot study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- Article
- Kidney Function-Specific Performance of High-Sensitivity Troponin T and I Using 0/1 h and 0/3 h Protocols in Suspected Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Automated computation of the HEART score with the GPT-4 large language model.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing Analytical Performance and Correct Classification for Cardiac Troponin Deltas Across Diagnostic Pathways Used for Myocardial Infarction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Performance Evaluation of the New High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Immunoassay on CL-2600i Mindray Analyzer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have significantly refined the resolution of biomarker-level detection and have emerged as the gold standard cardiac biomarker in evaluating myocardial injury. Since its introduction, hs-cTn has been integrated into the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction and various European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain syndromes. However, despite its integral role in caring for patients with chest pain, there are still substantive gaps in our knowledge of the clinical interpretation of dynamic changes in hs-cTn values. Whether a relative or absolute hs-cTn delta should be used to detect acute myocardial injury remains debatable. There are also emerging considerations of possible sex and racial/ethnic differences in clinically significant troponin deltas. In the emergency department, there is debate about the optimal time frame to recheck hs-cTn after symptom onset for myocardial infarction rule-out and whether hs-cTn deltas should be integrated into clinical risk scores. In this review, we will provide an overview of the history of clinical utilization of cardiac biomarkers, the development of hs-cTn assays, and the ongoing search for a meaningful delta that can be clinically applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.