Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39452048›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2024

Neurofeedback Training Protocols in Sports: A Systematic Review of Recent Advances in Performance, Anxiety, and Emotional Regulation.

Beatrice Tosti, Stefano Corrado, Stefania Mancone, Tommaso Di Libero, Chiara Carissimo, Gianni Cerro, Angelo Rodio, Vernon Furtado da Silva, Danilo Reis Coimbra, Alexandro Andrade and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Beatrice TostiDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.
Stefano CorradoDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2064-3372
Stefania ManconeDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9837-526X
Tommaso Di LiberoDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-9064-4362
Chiara CarissimoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0151-7274
Gianni CerroDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6843-7140
Angelo RodioDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2964-7193
Vernon Furtado da SilvaInstituto de Psiquiatria-IPUB, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 21941-853, Brazil.
Danilo Reis CoimbraFaculty of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, UFJF, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, Brazil.
Alexandro AndradeHealth and Sports Science Center, Department of Physical Education, CEFID, Santa Catarina State University, Florianópolis 88035-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6640-9314
Pierluigi DiotaiutiDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5470-3233

Funding

Rome Technopole MUR Decree n. 105123.06.2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background. Neurofeedback has been used in sports since the 1990s, frequently showing positive outcomes in enhancing athletic performance. This systematic review provides an updated analysis of neurofeedback training in sports, evaluating reaction time, cognitive performance, and emotional regulation to address literature gaps and suggest future research directions. (2) Methods. A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases for articles published from January 2016 to April 2023. The search included only original articles written in English, resulting in 24 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. (3) Results. The reviewed studies cover a wide range of sports, including golf, basketball, swimming, rifle shooting, football, volleyball, athletics, judo, ice hockey, triathlon, handball, fencing, taekwondo, and darts. They involved athletes of varying experience levels (beginners, professionals, and experts) and utilized neurofeedback training targeting different frequency bands (alpha, beta, theta, and SMR), either individually or in mixed protocols. Findings show improvements in sports and cognitive performance, emotional regulation, and anxiety management. (4) Conclusions. This systematic review supports the effectiveness of neurofeedback in enhancing sports and cognitive performance across various disciplines and experience levels. Notable improvements were observed in technical skills, physical performance parameters, scoring, attention, concentration, reaction time, short-term and working memory, self-regulation, and cognitive anxiety. Future research should standardize protocols, include more diverse samples, and explore long-term effects to further validate these findings.

Indexed as

alpha-band traininganxiety managementathletic trainingbeta-band trainingcognitive performanceEEG biofeedbackemotional regulationneurofeedbackreaction timesports performance

Identifiers

PMID39452048
PMCPMC11506327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.