Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451914›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Bias in O-Information Estimation.

Johanna Gehlen, Jie Li, Cillian Hourican, Stavroula Tassi, Pashupati P Mishra, Terho Lehtimäki, Mika Kähönen, Olli Raitakari, Jos A Bosch, Rick Quax

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Johanna GehlenComputational Science Lab, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jie LiComputational Science Lab, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cillian HouricanComputational Science Lab, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-3161-0736
Stavroula TassiUnit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems (MEDLAB), Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Pashupati P MishraDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland.
Terho LehtimäkiDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland.
Mika KähönenFinnish Cardiovascular Research Center Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33720 Tampere, Finland.
Olli RaitakariCentre for Population Health Research, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland.
Jos A BoschClinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1018 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rick QuaxComputational Science Lab, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1098 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0299-0074

Funding

Academy of Finland 349708Academy of Finland 356405, 322098, 286284, 134309 (Eye), 126925, 121584, 124282, 129378 (Salve), 117797 (Gendi), and 141071 (Skidi)EU Horizon 2020 grant 755320 for TAXINOMISIS and grant 848146 for To AitionEuropean Research Council grant 742927 for MULTIEPIGEN projectNetherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), 09120012010063pBETTER4U EU (Preventing obesity through Biologically and bEhaviorally Tailored inTERventions for you) 101080117To_Aition 848146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher-order relationships are a central concept in the science of complex systems. A popular method of attempting to estimate the higher-order relationships of synergy and redundancy from data is through the O-information. It is an information-theoretic measure composed of Shannon entropy terms that quantifies the balance between redundancy and synergy in a system. However, bias is not yet taken into account in the estimation of the O-information of discrete variables. In this paper, we explain where this bias comes from and explore it for fully synergistic, fully redundant, and fully independent simulated systems of n=3 variables. Specifically, we explore how the sample size and number of bins affect the bias in the O-information estimation. The main finding is that the O-information of independent systems is severely biased towards synergy if the sample size is smaller than the number of jointly possible observations. This could mean that triplets identified as highly synergistic may in fact be close to independent. A bias approximation based on the Miller-Maddow method is derived for the O-information. We find that for systems of n=3 variables the bias approximation can partially correct for the bias. However, simulations of fully independent systems are still required as null models to provide a benchmark of the bias of the O-information.

Indexed as

biascomplex systemshigher-order relationshipsinformation synergyO-information

Identifiers

PMID39451914
PMCPMC11507536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.