Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451908›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessing Credibility in Bayesian Networks Structure Learning.

Vitor Barth, Fábio Serrão, Carlos Maciel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vitor BarthDepartment of Electrical and Computing Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2285-3314
Fábio SerrãoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-905, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3655-9933
Carlos MacielDepartment of Electrical Engineering, State University of São Paulo, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0137-6678

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.822255/2023-00National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 130859/2020-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning Bayesian networks from data aims to create a Directed Acyclic Graph that encodes significant statistical relationships between variables and their joint probability distributions. However, when using real-world data with limited knowledge of the original dynamical system, it is challenging to determine if the learned DAG accurately reflects the underlying relationships, especially when the data come from multiple independent sources. This paper describes a methodology capable of assessing the credible interval for the existence and direction of each edge within Bayesian networks learned from data, without previous knowledge of the underlying dynamical system. It offers several advantages over classical methods, such as data fusion from multiple sources, identification of latent variables, and extraction of the most prominent edges with their respective credible interval. The method is evaluated using simulated datasets of various sizes and a real use case. Our approach was verified to achieve results comparable to the most recent studies in the field, while providing more information on the model's credibility.

Indexed as

Bayesian networksexplainable modelsprobabilistic learning

Identifiers

PMID39451908
PMCPMC11507489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.