Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451806›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Biomimetic Origami: A Biological Influence in Design.

Hadi Ebrahimi Fakhari, Juan Rosario Barboza, Pezhman Mardanpour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hadi Ebrahimi FakhariDepartment of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 W Flagler St, Suite 3464, Miami, FL 33174, USA.
Juan Rosario BarbozaDepartment of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 W Flagler St, Suite 3464, Miami, FL 33174, USA.
Pezhman MardanpourDepartment of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 W Flagler St, Suite 3464, Miami, FL 33174, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1423-0304

Funding

United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-22-1-0525United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-23-1-0716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Origami, the art of paper folding, has long fascinated researchers and designers in its potential to replicate and tap the complexity of nature. In this paper, we pursue the crossing of origami engineering structures and biology, the realm of biologically-inspired origami structures categorized by the two biggest taxonomy kingdoms and DNA origami. Given the diversity of life forms that Earth comprises, we pursue an analysis of biomimetic designs that resemble intricate patterns and functionalities occurring in nature. Our research begins by setting out a taxonomic framework for the classification of origami structures based on biologically important kingdoms. From each of these, we explore the engineering structures inspired by morphological features, behaviors, and ecological adaptations of organisms. We also discuss implications in realms such as sustainability, biomaterials development, and bioinspired robotics. Thus, by parlaying the principles found in nature's design playbook through the art of folding, biologically inspired origami becomes fertile ground for interdisciplinary collaboration and creativity. Through this approach, we aim to inspire readers, researchers, and designers to embark on a journey of discovery in which the boundaries between art, science, and nature are blurred, providing a foundation for innovation to thrive.

Indexed as

biomimetic origamiDNA origamiorigami-inspired structuresroboticstaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID39451806
PMCPMC11505286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.