ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Impact of Vehicle Steering Strategy on the Severity of Pedestrian Head Injury.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reconstructing Real-World Vehicle Side-Impact Accidents to Computationally Investigate Far-Side Occupant Injury Risk.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to the sudden violation of pedestrians crossing the road, intelligent vehicles take into account factors such as the road conditions in the accident zone, traffic rules, and surrounding vehicles' driving status to make emergency evasive decisions. Thus, the collision simulation models for pedestrians and three types of vehicles, i.e., sedans, Sport Utility Vehicles (SUVs), and Multi-Purpose Vehicle (MPVs), are built to investigate the impact of vehicle types, vehicle steering angles, collision speeds, collision positions, and pedestrian orientations on head injuries of pedestrians. The results indicate that the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) value of the head increases with the increase in collision speed. Regarding the steering angles, when a vehicle's steering direction aligns with a pedestrian's position, the pedestrian remains on top of the vehicle's hood for a longer period and moves together with the vehicle after the collision. This effectively reduces head injuries to pedestrians. However, when the vehicle's steering direction is opposite to the pedestrian's position, the pedestrian directly collides with the ground, resulting in higher head injuries. Among them, MPVs cause the most severe injuries, followed by SUVs, and sedans have the least impact. Overall, intelligent vehicles have great potential to reduce head injuries of pedestrians in the event of sudden pedestrian-vehicle collisions by combining with Automatic Emergency Steering (AES) measures. In the future, efforts need to be made to establish an optimized steering strategy and optimize the handling of situations where steering is ineffective or even harmful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.