ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024
Integrative Biomarker Panel for Improved Lung Cancer Diagnosis Using Plasma microRNAs and Sputum Bacterial DNA.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sputum Liquid Biopsy for Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Subtyping, Surveillance, Response Prediction, and Prognostication: A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Blood-Based miRNA Panels for Timely Detection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Streptococcus pneumoniae infection is associated with matrix metalloproteinase-9 in lung cancer progression and brain metastases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate if integrating diverse molecular biomarkers in plasma and sputum could improve the diagnosis of lung cancer. The study analyzed miRNAs in plasma and bacterial DNA in sputum from 58 lung cancer patients and 62 cancer-free smokers using droplet digital PCR. The individual plasma miRNA and sputum bacterial biomarkers had sensitivities of 62-71% and specificities of 61-79% for diagnosing lung cancer. A panel of plasma miRNA or sputum bacterial biomarkers produced sensitivities of 79-85% and specificities of 74-82%. An integromic signature consisting of two miRNAs in plasma and three bacterial biomarkers in sputum had a higher sensitivity (87%) and specificity (89%) compared to individual biomarkers. The signature's diagnostic value was confirmed in a validation cohort of 56 lung cancer patients and 59 controls, independent of tumor stage, histological type, and demographic factors. Integrating diverse molecular biomarkers in plasma and sputum could improve the diagnosis of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.