Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451717›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2024

A Machine Learning Assisted Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Biosensor to Detect Urea Based on Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Functionalized with Copper Oxide Micro-Flowers.

Jitendra B Zalke, Manish L Bhaiyya, Pooja A Jain, Devashree N Sakharkar, Jayu Kalambe, Nitin P Narkhede, Mangesh B Thakre, Dinesh R Rotake, Madhusudan B Kulkarni, Shiv Govind Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Nanozymes Integrated Biochips Toward Smart Detection System.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jitendra B ZalkeDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Ramdeobaba University, Nagpur 440013, MH, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5382-3508
Manish L BhaiyyaDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Ramdeobaba University, Nagpur 440013, MH, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4442-3753
Pooja A JainDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Shri Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur 440013, MH, India.
Devashree N SakharkarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Shri Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur 440013, MH, India.
Jayu KalambeDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Ramdeobaba University, Nagpur 440013, MH, India.
Nitin P NarkhedeDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Ramdeobaba University, Nagpur 440013, MH, India.
Mangesh B ThakreDepartment of Chemistry, D.R.B. Sindhu Mahavidhyalaya, Nagpur 440017, MH, India.
Dinesh R RotakeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 502284, TG, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2036-463X
Madhusudan B KulkarniDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2911-3784
Shiv Govind SinghDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 502284, TG, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting urea is crucial for diagnosing related health conditions and ensuring timely medical intervention. The addition of machine learning (ML) technologies has completely changed the field of biochemical sensing, providing enhanced accuracy and reliability. In the present work, an ML-assisted screen-printed, flexible, electrochemical, non-enzymatic biosensor was proposed to quantify urea concentrations. For the detection of urea, the biosensor was modified with a multi-walled carbon nanotube-zinc oxide (MWCNT-ZnO) nanocomposite functionalized with copper oxide (CuO) micro-flowers (MFs). Further, the CuO-MFs were synthesized using a standard sol-gel approach, and the obtained particles were subjected to various characterization techniques, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The sensor's performance for urea detection was evaluated by assessing the dependence of peak currents on analyte concentration using cyclic voltammetry (CV) at different scan rates of 50, 75, and 100 mV/s. The designed non-enzymatic biosensor showed an acceptable linear range of operation of 0.5-8 mM, and the limit of detection (LoD) observed was 78.479 nM, which is well aligned with the urea concentration found in human blood and exhibits a good sensitivity of 117.98 mA mM

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCopperElectrochemical TechniquesMachine LearningNanotubes, CarbonUreaHumansLimit of DetectionZinc OxideCoppercuprous oxideNanotubes, CarbonUreaZinc Oxidebiomarkercopper oxide (CuO) micro-flowers (MFs)electrochemical detectionmachine learning (ML)non-enzymaticscreen-printed electrodes (SPEs)urea

Identifiers

PMID39451717
PMCPMC11505716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.