ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy Among Diabetic Patients from Northeastern Bulgaria.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Type 5 diabetes mellitus: nutritional-imprinted β-cell insufficiency, diagnostic gaps, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of visual impairment globally among working-aged individuals. This study aims to update data on DR prevalence in Bulgaria.
methodsThe present cross-sectional study was conducted between 1 January 2022 and 1 January 2023, using a local diabetes registry from the city of Varna as a sampling framework. In total, 587 diabetic patients underwent DR examination. Data included demographics, diabetes type/duration, treatment, and ophthalmic history. DR status was assessed using indirect slit-lamp biomicroscopy or digital fundus photography, graded by the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Scale.
resultsOf 587 participants, 13 were excluded due to cataract-related ungradable images. The median age was 65 years (IQR 56-73), with a slight female predominance (54%). The overall prevalence of any DR was 39.9% (95% CI 35.9-44.0), with non-proliferative DR (NPDR) at 27.5%, proliferative DR (PDR) at 7.3%, and macular edema (DME) at 5%. Type 1 diabetes patients had significantly higher DR prevalence (68.8%) than type 2 (34.1%,
conclusionsThese findings provide epidemiological insights for future research and emphasize the need for a comprehensive national DR screening program in Bulgaria. Technological advancements enable proactive measures to mitigate DR-related visual impairment and blindness, including widespread screening, even in rural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.