Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451635›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Rapid Molecular Diagnostics in Vulvovaginal Candidosis.

Karolina Akinosoglou, Georgios Schinas, Despoina Papageorgiou, Eleni Polyzou, Zoe Massie, Sabriye Ozcelik, Francesca Donders, Gilbert Donders

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Non-Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antifungal susceptibility profiles ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karolina AkinosoglouSchool of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4289-9494
Georgios SchinasSchool of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7963-1865
Despoina PapageorgiouSchool of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.
Eleni PolyzouSchool of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.
Zoe MassieFemicare, Clinical Research for Women, 3300 Tienen, Belgium.
Sabriye OzcelikFemicare, Clinical Research for Women, 3300 Tienen, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0008-0651-4797
Francesca DondersFemicare, Clinical Research for Women, 3300 Tienen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0376-0067
Gilbert DondersFemicare, Clinical Research for Women, 3300 Tienen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9890-6254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesVulvovaginal candidosis (VVC) is a common condition among women, with current diagnostic methods relying on clinical evaluation and laboratory testing. These traditional methods are often limited by the need for specialized training, variable performance, and lengthy diagnostic processes, leading to delayed treatment and inappropriate antifungal use. This review evaluates the efficacy of molecular diagnostic tools for VVC and provides guidance on their application in clinical practice.

methodsA literature search was conducted using PubMed to identify studies evaluating rapid diagnostic tests specifically for vulvovaginal

resultsTwenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, predominantly evaluating nucleid acid amplification tests/polymerase chain reaction (NAAT/PCR) assays and DNA probes. PCR/NAAT assays demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity (>86%) for VVC diagnosis, outperforming conventional diagnostic methods. Comparatively, DNA probes, while simpler, exhibited lower sensitivity. The included studies were mostly observational, with only one randomized controlled trial. Emerging diagnostic technologies, including artificial intelligence and integrated testing models, show promise for improving diagnostic precision and clinical outcomes.

conclusionsMolecular diagnostics offer a significant improvement in VVC management, though traditional methods remain valuable in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

diagnostic techniques and proceduresDNA probesmolecular diagnostic techniquesnucleic acid amplification techniquespolymerase chain reactionvulvovaginal candidiasisvulvovaginal candidosis

Identifiers

PMID39451635
PMCPMC11506430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.