ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Are Optometrists Prepared to Be Involved in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation?
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesStroke survivors often experience various visual consequences that impact their daily life and may benefit from visual interventions. However, some of these usually go unaddressed as optometrists are rarely included in the post-stroke care pathway. Yet, optometrists are interested in contributing to the care of these patients. This survey evaluated the readiness of optometrists in diagnosing and managing visual disorders specific to stroke survivors.
methodsA questionnaire was developed by the researchers, pilot tested by 5 research optometrists and 15 community optometrists, and modified based on the feedback. Practicing optometrists were invited to complete the anonymous online survey through optometric organizations in Canada, the US, Hong Kong, India, and the UK.
resultsMost respondents displayed strong knowledge, but 61.6% indicated that enhancing their knowledge would be helpful. The majority (87%) agreed that stroke is related to an increased incidence of falls. Participants' knowledge regarding the natural history of post-stroke visual disorders was poorer. There were also inconsistencies regarding what optometrists considered ideal interventions and what they undertook in practice. More than 50% of respondents reported that the quality of published evidence on post-stroke visual consequences was low or nonexistent.
conclusionsOverall, survey respondents displayed sufficient knowledge. However, there are areas of uncertainty in their knowledge, which in many cases correspond to real gaps in the available evidence. There is a need to identify and remediate these gaps to enable optometrists to deliver quality optometric care as collaborative members of the post-stroke professional team, which would eventually improve the rehabilitation of stroke survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.